Herbert Smith Freehills (London)

Stephen Wisking

Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Partner

Stephen Wisking is a partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, based in London. Stephen practises in all aspects of competition law. He has extensive experience in contentious competition matters including cartels, market investigations and competition litigation (follow-on damages, stand-alone litigation and regulatory appeals) as well as providing non-contentious strategic competition advice and advising on mergers. He has been involved in competition disputes since the start of his career and has been involved in numerous cases in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) since its inception in 2001. He is a qualified solicitor advocate and has appeared as an advocate in the CAT. His particular sectoral experience is in relation to media (particularly broadcasting), telecoms, energy and pharmaceuticals and professional services. Stephen works on large and complex competition and economic regulatory disputes and investigations involving highly technical expert evidence.

Distinctions

Auteurs associés

Herbert Smith Freehills (Melbourne)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Herbert Smith Freehills (Johannesburg)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)

Articles

8875 Bulletin

Stephen Wisking, Susan Black, Veronica Roberts, Kristien Geeurickx, Alexander Rickets The UK Government introduces a Bill before Parliament which would hand new powers to the Competition Authority to regulate digital markets

158

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill (DMCC Bill) has now been published and introduced before Parliament. This Bill is long awaited, having been delayed by parliamentary priorities and timing considerations. Its scope and implications are wide-ranging, and follow on both from a (...)

Stephen Wisking, Daniel Vowden, Phoebe Hirst The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal finds in favour of two automobile manufacturer’s challenges against the extraterritorial application of the competition authority’s investigatory powers (Volkswagen / BMW)

537

On 8 February 2023, the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) issued a joint judgment in two cases : BMW AG v CMA and R (on the application of VW AG) v CMA, relating to the territorial scope of the CMA’s information gathering powers under Section 26 of the Competition Act 1998 (CA98). The CAT (...)

Stephen Wisking, Andrew North, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Supreme Court overturns the ruling of the Court of Appeal on costs in a dispute between the Competition Authority and two pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer / Flynn Pharma)

320

On 25 May 2022 the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal’s ruling on costs in Pfizer and Flynn Pharma and concluded that the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) had applied the correct test when awarding a proportion of their costs against the CMA. The Court of Appeal had held that, (...)

Stephen Wisking, Veronica Roberts, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Government publishes its response to the consultation proposing a wide range of far-reaching changes to the competition and consumer protection regimes

422

On 20 April 2022 the UK government published its response to the consultation launched in July 2021, proposing a wide range of far-reaching changes to the UK competition and consumer protection regimes (see our blog post on the consultation here). Taking into account the feedback received from (...)

Stephen Wisking, Joe Williams, Joe Moorcroft-Moran The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal rules that class action proceedings may only be brought on an opt-in basis where the class of potential complainants is sophisticated and thus opt-in is practicable (Evans / O’Higgins)

360

The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT“) has ruled for the first time that collective proceedings can only proceed on an opt-in basis, rather than the opt-out basis sought by the class applicants. The ruling came in the O’Higgins/Evans case, concerning two competing applications for a (...)

Stephen Wisking, Tim Briggs, Lode Van Den Hende, Morris Schonberg The UK Government publishes a consultation on how to define “subsidies of interest” and “subsidies of particular interest” under the new national subsidy control regime

170

On 25 March 2022, the UK Government published a consultation on how “subsidies of interest” and “subsidies of particular interest” are to be defined under the UK’s new subsidy control regime. These concepts are fundamental, as they determine which subsidies are to be referred to the UK’s (...)

Stephen Wisking, Sean Giles, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Authority initiates proceedings in the High Court seeking the disqualification of seven directors in connection with its decision on illegal market sharing arrangements for the supply of Prochlorperazine tablets (Alliance Pharmaceuticals / Focus / Lexon / Medreich)

66

Through a pattern of recent enforcement action, the UK Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA") has sent a clear message to business : it will not hesitate to hold senior management personally liable for competition law infringements. As a matter of policy the CMA is increasingly determined (...)

Kim Dietzel, Stephen Wisking, Kristien Geeurickx The EU Court of Justice holds that a victim of anticompetitive conduct is entitled to seek damages from the subsidiary of an infringing parent company (Sumal / Mercedes Benz Trucks España)

221

In its judgment of 6 October 2021, following a reference by the Provincial Court of Barcelona, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) held that a victim of anti-competitive conduct is entitled to seek damages from the subsidiary (not referred to in the infringement decision) of an infringing (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kim Dietzel, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal approves the first application for a collective proceedings order under the competition class action regime (Merricks / Mastercard)

299

On 18 August 2021 the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) approved the first application for a collective proceedings order (CPO) under the UK’s competition class action regime introduced in 2015, in Walter Hugh Merricks CBE v Mastercard Incorporated and Others. The application was initially (...)

Stephen Wisking, Veronica Roberts, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Government launches a consultation on a wide range of far-reaching changes it is proposing to the UK competition and consumer protection regimes

399

On 20 July 2021 the UK government launched a consultation on a wide range of far-reaching changes it is proposing to the UK competition and consumer protection regimes. As a result of Brexit the UK is now in a position to decide, independently from the EU Commission, how it promotes and (...)

Kim Dietzel, Stephen Wisking, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Authority publishes a notice of a standalone competition damages claim against a trade association for abusing its dominant position and engaging in anti-competitive agreements (International Tin Association)

359

On 26 January 2021 the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) published a notice of a standalone competition damages claim (brought under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998) by Kerilee Investments, a metal trader, against the International Tin Association, a UK based trade association. The (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kim Dietzel, Andrew North, Ruth Allen The UK Supreme Court dismisses a credit card company’s appeal against the Court of Appeal’s granting of a collective proceedings order (Merricks / Mastercard)

227

Earlier today the Supreme Court handed down its hotly-anticipated judgment regarding the certification of an opt-out competition collective action brought by Walter Merricks against Mastercard. The claim is seeking £14bn in damages on behalf of some 46.2 million UK consumers, in respect of (...)

Daniel Woods, Stephen Wisking, Kim Dietzel, Ruth Allen The UK Supreme Court hands down a significant judgment relating to the certification of a £14bn opt-out competition collective action brought against a credit card company (Merricks / Mastercard)

178

On 11 December 2020 the Supreme Court handed down a very significant judgment relating to the certification of a £14bn opt-out competition collective action brought by Walter Merricks against Mastercard, in respect of losses alleged to have resulted from the use of anti-competitive (...)

Stephen Wisking, Daniel Vowden, Daniel Barrio, Agathe Célarié The EU Court of Justice annuls a Commission’s decision accepting legally binding commitments offered by a company aimed at addressing an investigation into cross-border pay-TV in the EU (Paramount / Sky / Groupe Canal +)

146

On 9 December 2020, the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) annulled a European Commission decision accepting legally binding commitments offered by Paramount aimed at addressing a Commission investigation into cross-border pay-TV in the EU (the “Paramount Commitment Decision”). The CJEU also (...)

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Stephen Wisking, André Pretorius, Kristien Geeurickx The EU Commission publishes a Temporary Framework for assessing antitrust issues relating to business cooperation as a response to the urgency stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic

489

On 8 April 2020 the Commission published a ‘Temporary framework for assessing antitrust issues related to business cooperation in response to situations of urgency stemming from the current COVID-19 outbreak’ (Temporary Framework). The Commission recognises the exceptional challenges faced by (...)

Ruth Allen, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Stephen Wisking The UK Court of Appeal seeks to reinstate record fines imposed on pharmaceutical companies for abuse of dominant position through excessive and unfair pricing of an anti-epilepsy drug (Pfizer / Flynn)

314

On 10 March 2020 the UK Court of Appeal handed down its hotly anticipated judgment in Flynn Pharma Limited & Anr vs Competition and Markets Authority. The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) was seeking to reinstate record fines totalling £89.4m imposed on pharmaceutical companies (...)

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Stephen Wisking, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Government provides a withdrawal agreement for the Competition Authority’s merger control during the Brexit transition period and after

74

On 31 January 2020, at 11pm GMT, the UK ceased to be a Member State of the EU and the transition period provided for in Article 126 of the Withdrawal Agreement started to run. This briefing looks at the provisions in the Withdrawal Agreement that are relevant for merger control, both during (...)

Stephen Wisking, Susan Black, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Authority disqualifies three former directors of companies involved in a bid rigging cartel in the design, construction and fit-out services market (Robb Simms-Davies / Trevor Hall / Oliver James Hammond)

117

On 10th May 2019 the CMA secured the disqualification of three former directors of companies involved in a bid rigging cartel in the design, construction and fit-out services sector. The three directors have given legally binding disqualification undertakings under which they will be banned (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kim Dietzel, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Court of Appeal overturns the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s refusal to certify a collective action claim (MasterCard / Merricks)

18

In its judgment of 16 April 2019 the Court of Appeal overturned the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (CAT) decision refusing certification in the MasterCard collective action claim and remitted the case back to the CAT for a re-hearing. The CAT’s refusal to certify the claim and grant a (...)

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx, Stephen Wisking The EU Court of Justice holds that the principles applied in order to determine the relevant entities for liability for fines should also be applied to determine the relevant entities liable for damages under private damages claims (Vantaan kaupunki / Skanska)

149

In a preliminary ruling request made by the Finnish Supreme Court on the question of the relevant entities liable for damages, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) held that principles applied in order to determine the relevant entities for liability for fines under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (...)

Stephen Wisking, Veronica Roberts, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal upholds the Competition Authority’s first infringement decision for breach of an interim order in a merger investigation (Electro Rent)

114

On 11 February 2019 the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) upheld the CMA’s first infringement decision for breach of an interim order imposed on a completed merger under investigation. Electro Rent had served a break notice on the lease of its UK premises without first seeking the CMA’s (...)

Andrew Lidbetter, Nusrat Zar, Stephen Wisking, Jasveer Randhawa The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal holds that the deadlines set by the Competition Authority for the applicants to respond to working papers and for the main party hearing to be held were unreasonable and unfair (Sainsbury / Asda)

23

In J Sainsbury plc and Asda Group Limited v Competition and Markets Authority [2019] CAT 1, 18 January 2019 the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) granted an application made jointly by Sainsbury’s and Asda (the "Applicants") in respect of two decisions by a regulator, the Competition and (...)

Stephen Wisking, Susan Black, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, André Pretorius The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal hands down its judgement upholding the Competition Authority’s decision that an online sales ban constituted a restriction of competition by object (Ping)

107

On 7 September 2018, the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") handed down its judgment in Ping upholding the Competition and Market Authority ("CMA")’s decision that Ping’s online sales ban ("OSB") constituted a restriction of competition by object under EU and UK competition law. The aim of (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kristien Geeurickx, Kyriakos Fountoukakos The EU General Court confirms that a bank investor was jointly and severally liable for the conduct of one of the cartelists (Goldman Sachs)

78

The General Court’s ruling in Goldman Sachs’ appeal in the power cables cartel confirms that the bank was jointly and severally liable for the conduct of Prysmian, one of the cartelists, because of the nature of its investment in the company. The General Court confirmed that the Commission was (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx The EU Court of Justice provides guidance on the standstill obligation which prevents parties from implementing their transaction before the EU Commission issues a clearance decision (EY / KPMG)

95

For the first time since the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR) came into force the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has provided guidance on the scope the standstill obligation (Article 7(1) EUMR) which prevents parties implementing their transaction before the EU Commission issues a clearance (...)

Kim Dietzel, Stephen Wisking The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal allows the first class action brought under the competition law collective redress regime and continues providing some clarifications on important aspects of the regime (Dorothy Gibson / Pride Mobility Products)

95

Already, 2017 has seen significant developments in the UK’s competition litigation landscape. Most recently, last Friday the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) allowed the first ’class action’ brought under the new competition law collective redress regime to continue, at least for now, (...)

Kim Dietzel, Stephen Wisking The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal awards £8.6 million damages and finds that an undertaking setting of national multilateral interchange fees for its payment cards infringed national and EU competition law on anticompetitive agreements (Sainsbury’s / MasterCard)

96

On 14 Jul the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) issued its judgment in the damages claim brought by Sainsbury’s against MasterCard. The CAT found that MasterCard’s setting of UK multilateral interchange fees (MIFs) for its payment cards infringed the Article 101 TFEU/Chapter I prohibition (...)

Stephen Wisking The UK Competition Authority issues a short form opinion clarifying the application of competition law to recommendations by two rural associations to their members concerning the prices to be charged for access to land (Broadband Wayleave Rates)

233

Introduction The Office of Fair Trading (’OFT’) in a Short Form Opinion dated 23 August 2012 has indicated that a proposed price recommendation to be made by two rural associations, the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) and the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) (collectively the Parties) (...)

Stephen Wisking The UK Office of Fair Trading seeks undertakings in lieu of a referral to the Competition Commission in an anticipated acquisition of a company providing waste management, processing and related services to the medical sector (Cliniserve / SRCL)

99

All views expressed are strictly personal views of the author. The present case note does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. On 21 November 2008, the Office of Fair Trading (the "OFT") announced its decision to seek undertakings from SRCL Limited (" SRCL") in (...)

Stephen Wisking The Court of Appeal of England and Wales confirms that a combination of vertical contacts between a manufacturer and retailers can spill over into a horizontal agreement between the retailers, even where there has been no direct contact between them (Argos / Littlewoods / JJB)

131

All views expressed are strictly personal views of the author. The present case note does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. On 19 October 2006, the Court of Appeal issued its ruling in an appeal involving Argos, Littlewoods and JJB under the Competition Act (...)

Statistiques


8875
Total des visites

201.7
Nombre de lectures par contribution

44
Nombre de contributions

Classement de l'auteur
212ème
En nombre de contributions
1108ème
En nombre total de visites
6467ème
En nombre moyen de visites
Envoyer un message