Gleiss Lutz (Munich)

Petra Linsmeier

Gleiss Lutz (Munich)
Partner

Dr. Petra Linsmeier is Partner in the Munich office of Gleiss Lutz and speaker of the Energy Focus Group. Petra Linsmeier advises mainly energy industry clients on German and European antitrust law, in particular merger control and cartel proceedings. She also regularly advises on compliance issues. Dr. Petra Linsmeier studied law in Passau, Prague and Munich. In 1999 she obtained her doctorate in law. She focuses on German and European antitrust law, merger control, energy law and compliance. Her working languages are German, English, French and Italian. Dr. Petra Linsmeier is regularly listed in the JUVE Handbook as a strongly recommended competition lawyer in Germany.

Auteurs associés

Gleiss Lutz (Frankfurt)
Gleiss Lutz (Stuttgart)
Gleiss Lutz (Munich)
Gleiss Lutz (Stuttgart)
Gleiss Lutz (Brussels)

Articles

49006 Bulletin

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Court of Justice decides on the obligation of car manufacturers to contract with authorised repairers of competitors (MAN-Vertragswerkstatt)

559

On 30 March 2010, the German Federal Court of Justice overruled a judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Munich and restored the judgment of the Regional Court of Munich in first instance. The question at stake was whether MAN had an obligation to contract with authorised repairers of (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Court of Justice decides on the compatibility of non-competition clauses to the detriment of minority shareholders with Art. 101 Para. 1 TFEU and Sec. 1 ARC (Gratiszeitung Hallo)

553

On 23 June 2009, the German Federal Court of Justice overruled three judgments of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf and remitted the cases back for further proceedings. In the joint proceedings before the Federal Court of Justice, the court had to decide whether a non-competition clause (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Court of Justice decides on the compatibility of non-competition clauses to the detriment of minority shareholders with Art. 101 Para. 1 TFEU and Sec. 1 ARC (Gratiszeitung Hallo)

1465

On 23 June 2009, the German Federal Court of Justice overruled three judgments of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf and remitted the cases back for further proceedings. In the joint proceedings before the Federal Court of Justice, the court had to decide whether a non-competition clause (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Court of Justice decides on a dominant position resulting from the upstream possibility to restrict downstream competition (Reisestellenkarte)

719

On 3 March 2009, the German Federal Court of Justice reversed the judgement of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf and remitted the case back for further proceedings. The question at stake was whether an undertaking could be regarded as dominant according to Art. 102 TFEU if due to its (...)

Ines Orth, Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Cartel Office clears a merger subject to structural remedies in the sugar regulated and oligopolistic market (Nordzucker/Danisco)

1137

On 17 February 2009, the German Federal Cartel Office cleared a merger in the sugar sector subject to conditions and obligations. The case concerned the indirect acquisition of the sugar activities of the Danish company Danisco Sugar A/S by the German sugar refinery Nordzucker AG, an (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf decides that a company may abuse its dominant position by concluding rental agreements, thereby preventing market access of competitors (Schilderpräger)

1139

On 12 December 2008, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf issued a decision concerning a rental agreement between a district and a manufacturer of car number plates. The case concerned the question whether a company having a local monopoly on the manufacturing market for car number plates (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf widens the scope of application of merger control law while prohibiting a merger in the copper continuous casting industry sector (A-TEC / Norddeutsche Affinerie)

1067

On 12 November 2008, the German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf approved a decision of the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) prohibiting the proposed acquisition of a 13.75% share in a company by a competitor. The case concerned the issue of whether, according to German law, a share (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Mannheim Regional Court holds that reciprocal representation agreements concluded between national collecting societies are not void (GEMA / BUMA / STEMRA)

1132

On 7 November 2008, the Regional Court of Mannheim issued a decision on the validity of territorial limitations contained in reciprocal representation agreements concluded between national collecting societies. The case concerned the question whether a national collecting society was entitled (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf holds that exclusive purchase obligations contained in franchise agreements are not necessarily prohibited as unfair hindrances, even though they cover the whole assortment of goods (Baumarkt)

1890

On 16 January 2008 the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf issued a decision on questions concerning the German prohibition of unfair hindrance, Sec. 20(1) of the German Act against Restraints on Competition (ARC). The questions arose in administrative proceedings by the German Federal Cartel (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Cartel Office imposes a fine on associations of pharmacists and pharmaceutical manufacturers for organising and accomplishing a lecture series intended to convince pharmacists to refrain from price competition (Arzneimittelhersteller)

2409

On 21 December 2007, the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) imposed a fine on nine state associations of pharmacists, five pharmaceutical companies and the Federal Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers for organising and accomplishing a lecture series intended to convince pharmacists to (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Cartel Office clears a merger setting up a joint electronic platform for trade in secondary gas transport capacities, making further efforts to establish competitive structures in the energy sector (VNG / Trac-x / EWE / E.ON / Thyssengas / APX B)

2734

On 12 October 2007, the German Federal Cartel Office cleared a merger in the energy sector. The German companies Thyssengas GmbH (Thyssengas), E.ON Gastransport AG & Co. KG (EGT) and EWE AG (EWE) planned to acquire shares in trac-x Transport Capacity Exchange GmbH (Trac-x), the provider of (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Competition Authority declares binding the commitments of an electricity generation company to cease the abuse proceedings for factoring CO2 certificates into its electricity tariffs (RWE)

2236

On 26 September 2007, the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) ceased abuse proceedings launched against RWE AG (RWE) in 2005 after it had declared RWE’s commitments to auction off electricity to be binding. The proceedings centred on the question whether RWE had abused its alleged dominant (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf specifies the criteria for concluding non-competition clauses to the detriment of minority shareholders (AnzeigenblattGU)

1935

In three cases dated 15 August 2007 and 26 June 2008 the German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf decided on the compatibility with competition law of non-competition clauses to the detriment of minority shareholders. In two of the cases, appeals against denial of leave to appeal are pending (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Hanseatic Higher Regional Court decides on the interpretation of the provision in national competition law concerning essential facilities (Hafa)

1556

On 3 May 2007, the German Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Bremen issued a decision on several questions concerning denial of access to essential facilities. The case concerned the question whether the operator of an exhibition centre was a dominant undertaking in charge of an infrastructure (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court decides on the relationship between trademark and title protection law on the one hand and competition law on the other hand (Harry Potter)

1207

On 11 April 2007, the German Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt issued a decision on the relationship between copyright, trademark and title protection law on the one hand and competition law on the other hand. The question at stake was whether restrictive clauses concerning the distribution (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Competition Authority prohibits a merger in the laser area cleared by the US DoJ showing its reluctance to apply a more effects-based short-term approach instead of a rather long-term structural approach (Coherent / Excel)

1548

On 25 October 2006, the German Federal Cartel Office prohibited the proposed merger between the two American companies Coherent, Inc. (Coherent) and Excel Technology, Inc. (Excel), each a market leader in the laser area . Facts Coherent is an American company, listed on the US stock (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The Dusseldorf Higher Regional Court holds that the term “free servicing” in Art. 4.1.k of EC Reg. 1400/2002 includes extended services provided that the supplier does not charge the buyer an additional fee (5-Sterne-Premium-Paket)

3107

On 20 September 2006, the German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf issued a decision on the interpretation of Regulation n° 1400/2002 concerning the contractual obligation of authorised repairers exclusively to use original spare parts instead of spare parts of matching quality. Facts (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Cartel Office gives guidance on the interpretation and application of the failing company defence while clearing a merger in the TV advertising sector (RTL / n-tv)

1185

On 11 April 2006, the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) unconditionally cleared the acquisition of shares in n-tv Nachrichtenfernsehen GmbH & Co. KG by RTL Television. The case concerned the question whether a merger strengthening the collective dominant position of RTL and ProSiebenSat.1 (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Competition Authority clears a merger in the hospital sector subject to remedies, therefore continuing its proactive role in reshaping the national hospital sector (AKK / UKE)

2591

On 8 March 2006, the German Federal Cartel Office cleared a merger in the hospital sector subject to conditions and obligations . The case concerned the acquisition of the Altona Children’s Hospital (AKK), Hamburg-Altona, by the Altona Children’s Hospital non-profit LLC (AKK gGmbH), a special (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Competition Authority prohibits a merger in the residential furnishings sector while giving guidance on the question of representativeness of market surveys and restricting the scope of application of the de minimis exemption (AGRO)

1731

On 29 September 2004 the German Federal Cartel Office prohibited the proposed merger between the American company Leggett & Platt, Inc. (L&P), a manufacturer and distributor of inter aliaresidential furnishings, and AGRO Federkernproduktions GmbH (AGRO), a German manufacturer of (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf holds that for foreign arbitration awards to be recognised and enforced in Germany they have to comply with fundamental provisions of competition law (Regenerative Wärmetauscher)

1617

On 21 July 2004, the German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf issued a decision on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards as regards competition law matters . Facts Until the end of 1989 the defendant was a producer and distributor of regenerative heat exchangers (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Federal Court of Justice decides on the validity of several standard clauses contained in motor vehicle distribution agreements (Citröen)

1080

On 13 July 2004, the German Federal Court of Justice issued a judgement on the validity of several standard clauses contained in motor vehicle distribution agreements concluded between the French automobile manufacturer CITROËN and its licensed dealers in Germany. The case concerned the (...)

Moritz Lichtenegger, Petra Linsmeier The German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf holds that hardcore restrictions are not per se appreciable if the relevant market share is below 1% (Tschechisches Bier)

3037

On 23 June 2004, the German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf issued a decision on the compatibility with EC law of a contract concerning an exclusive right to import Czech beer into Germany . Facts The plaintiff used to be the sole importer and authorised dealer in Germany for Budweiser (...)

Statistiques


49006
Total des visites

1750.2
Nombre de lectures par contribution

28
Nombre de contributions

Classement de l'auteur
333ème
En nombre de contributions
187ème
En nombre total de visites
1543ème
En nombre moyen de visites
Envoyer un message