RBB Economics (Düsseldorf)

Michael Dietrich

RBB Economics (Düsseldorf)
Associate Principal

Michael Dietrich was an associate principal in RBB’s Düsseldorf office, where he has relocated to in 2017 after 14 years in RBB’s Brussels office. Before joining RBB in 2002, he worked in the energy practice of a leading European economic consultancy, advising on electricity and gas regulation issues. Michael Dietrich has advised clients on many competition cases, both before the European Commission and before national competition authorities in Germany, Switzerland, the UK, Greece, South Africa, Chile, Brazil, China, South Korea, Australia and other countries. Michael provided advice to the parties on several EC Phase II merger cases, including Dow/DuPont, Zimmer/Biomet, Aegean/Olympic II, Friesland Foods/Campina, Johnson & Johnson/Guidant, Sony/BMG, GE/Instrumentarium and Carnival/P&O Princess Cruises, as well as on other notable merger cases such as AB InBev/SABMiller, IAG/Aer Lingus, Etihad/Alitalia, Andritz/Schuler, IAG/bmi, Sasol/Engen, Agfa/Lastra and VNU/Book Data. In addition to his merger work, Michael Dietrich has advised on a number of other cases before the European Commission (including the investigation into Google search), the German Bundeskartellamt and the Austrian competition authority. His non-merger assignments also include advice to the parties of the North transatlantic joint business agreement between American Airlines, British Airways and Iberia, and IAG’s and LATAM’s proposed South transatlantic agreement. Michael Dietrich holds a Master’s degree in Economics from the London School of Economics. He is a German national and fluent in German and English.


Auteurs associés

RBB Economics (Brussels)
RBB Economics (Brussels)
RBB Economics (London)
RBB Economics (Düsseldorf)
RBB Economics (London)


2049 Bulletin

André Pretorius, Henar González Durántez, Kristien Geeurickx, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Michael Dietrich, Sergio Sorinas The EU Court of Justice rules on issues concerning retroactive rebates and the procedures through which these rebates can be characterized as abusive (Post Danmark II)


This article has been nominated for the 2016 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. Introduction On 6 October 2015, the European Court of Justice (the Court) issued its preliminary ruling in Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet (Competition (...)


Total des visites

Nombre de lectures par contribution

Nombre de contributions

Classement de l'auteur
En nombre de contributions
En nombre total de visites
En nombre moyen de visites
Envoyer un message