Prof. Huffman is Professor at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. He teaches classes in Antitrust, Bankruptcy, Commercial Law, and Comparative and International Antitrust, and writes on issues of antitrust, consumer law, and bankruptcy. Before returning to the academy, Professor Huffman was affiliated with the Washington, D.C. litigation boutique Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner LLP, served as a trial attorney at the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, and clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
214
Lotes Co., a manufacturer of USB devices, sued its competitor Foxconn in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of Section One and Section Two of the Sherman Act. Lotes competes directly with Foxconn in the market for making and selling USB (...)
404
I. The State Action Doctrine State Action immunity from the application of U.S. antitrust law was established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Parker v. Brown. Based on principles of federalism and deference to state powers to structure their own economic policy, the doctrine allows (...)
450
Pleading Consumer Antitrust Claims* The U.S. has long followed a system of private enforcement of law meant to redress public harm. In the law of antitrust, from the very beginning U.S. law provided a claim to plaintiffs who could show harm flowing from the violation. Convincing private (...)
4236
Cette série d’articles illustre le débat sur le rôle de la politique de concurrence dans l’économie numérique. Chaque contribution aborde le sujet sous un angle différent. Les deux premières traitent des stratégies non tarifaires pratiquées par les plateformes numériques monopolistiques et des (...)
