Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)

Jeremy J. Calsyn

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
Partner

Jeremy Calsyn is a partner based in the Washington, D.C. office of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton. His practice focuses on transactional antitrust matters, criminal and civil Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigations, and antitrust litigation in federal and state courts, including complex class actions. Jeremy Calsyn joined the firm in 1999 and became partner in 2008. He received a J.D. degree, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University Law Center in 1999 and an undergraduate degree, summa cum laude, from Southwest Missouri State University in 1995. From 2000 to 2001 he served as law clerk to the Honorable Louis F. Oberdorfer of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Jeremy Calsyn is a member of the Bars in California and the District of Columbia.

Distinctions

Auteurs associés

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Cologne)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Hong Kong)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Brussels)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)

Articles

1881 Bulletin

Brian Byrne, Heather Nyong’o, Jeremy J. Calsyn, Larry Malm, Joseph Kay The US District Court for the District of Connecticut acquits the defendants in a no poach trial on the grounds that no reasonable jury could convict on the case presented by the government (Mahesh Patel / Robert Harvey / Harpreet Wasan / Steven Houghtaling / Tom Edwards / Gary Prus)

13

On April 28, 2023, U.S. District Court Judge Victor A. Bolden entered an Order under Criminal Procedure Rule 29 acquitting the defendants in United States v. Patel, a federal criminal prosecution claiming that individuals employed by an aerospace company and its suppliers of outsourced labor (...)

Leah Brannon, Jeremy J. Calsyn, George S. Cary, Daniel P. Culley, Elaine Ewing, David I. Gelfand, Bruce Hoffman, Heather Nyong’o, Kenneth Reinker The US FTC and DoJ announce plans to review and update merger guidelines in order to strengthen enforcement against illegal mergers

233

On Tuesday, January 18th, FTC Chair Lina Khan and DOJ Antitrust Division Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter held a joint press conference in which they announced ambitious plans to review and update the Merger Guidelines, targeting a release of new guidelines before the end of 2022. (...)

Leah Brannon, Brian Byrne, Jeremy J. Calsyn, George S. Cary, Alexis Collins The US State of New York Senate adopts the Twenty-First Century Antitrust Act to amend its State antitrust law

408

The New York state Senate has passed the “Twenty-First Century Antitrust Act” (S. 933) to amend its state antitrust law, radically changing the risks of doing business in New York. It ostensibly aims at so-called “Big Tech,” but applies to all businesses, even those having very little contact with (...)

Leah Brannon, Brian Byrne, Jeremy J. Calsyn, George S. Cary, Alexis Collins, Daniel P. Culley, Elaine Ewing, David I. Gelfand, Bruce Hoffman, Mark W. Nelson, Kenneth Reinker The US FTC issues commentary on vertical merger enforcement explaining the approach to assessing the competitive effects of vertical mergers

95

On December 22, 2020, the US Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) issued a Commentary on Vertical Merger Enforcement. This follows the recent issuance of revised Vertical Merger Guidelines published jointly by the FTC and Department of Justice (the “Agencies”) on June 30, 2020. While the Guidelines (...)

Leah Brannon, Brian Byrne, Jeremy J. Calsyn, George S. Cary, Daniel P. Culley, Elaine Ewing, David I. Gelfand, Bruce Hoffman, Kenneth Reinker The US FTC and DoJ publish final revised vertical merger guidelines

19

On June 30, 2020, the US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (the “Agencies”) published final Vertical Merger Guidelines. Draft Guidelines were previously released for public comment on January 10. The Guidelines largely reflect the Agencies’ current approach and do not appear to (...)

Jeremy J. Calsyn, Patrick Bock The US FTC imposes conduct remedies prior to clearing a vertical merger causing anticompetitive concerns in the soft drink industry (PepsiCo / Pepsi Bottling)

362

After a decade of what was perceived by many as relatively restrained merger enforcement, the Obama administration has repeatedly and vocally vowed to “reinvigorate antitrust enforcement” and to “take effective action to stop or restructure mergers that are likely to harm consumer[s]”. Many (...)

Jeremy J. Calsyn, Patrick Bock The US District Court for the District of Columbia seeks to divest part of a business and requires a licensing of software to mitigate the anticompetitive effects of a merger in the ticketing services industry (Ticketmaster / Live Nation)

450

After a decade of what was perceived by many as relatively restrained merger enforcement, the Obama administration has repeatedly and vocally vowed to “reinvigorate antitrust enforcement” and to “take effective action to stop or restructure mergers that are likely to harm consumer[s]”. Many (...)

Jeremy J. Calsyn, Patrick Bock The US FTC employs a creative remedy, requiring the offer of divestiture to determine the existence of a viable alternative purchaser, before approving the merger of acute care hospitals (King’s Daughters Hospital / Scott & White)

301

After a decade of what was perceived by many as relatively restrained merger enforcement, the Obama administration has repeatedly and vocally vowed to “reinvigorate antitrust enforcement” and to “take effective action to stop or restructure mergers that are likely to harm consumer[s]”. Many (...)

Envoyer un message