Stanford University USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles)

Douglas Melamed

Stanford University, USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles)
Scholar in Residence

Doug Melamed is Visiting Fellow and former Professor of the Practice of Law at the Stanford Law School and Scholar in Residence at USC Gould School of Law. He was Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Intel Corporation from 2009 until he joined the Stanford faculty in 2014. Prior to joining Intel he was a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of WilmerHale, where he had been Chair of the Antitrust and Competition Practice Group. He joined WilmerHale in 1971. Mr. Melamed served in the U.S. Department of Justice from October 1996 to January 2001 as Acting Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division and, before then, as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General. He has authored numerous articles on antitrust and on law and economics. He is a contributing editor of the Antitrust Law Journal, a life member of the American Law Institute, and a former member of the Yale University Council. Mr. Melamed received his B.A from Yale University in 1967 and his J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1970, where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review. 

Distinctions

Auteurs associés

Stanford University - Graduate School of Business
Stanford University
USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles)
Stanford University
USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles)

Vidéos

Douglas Melamed
Douglas Melamed 5 avril 2016 Washington, DC
Douglas Melamed, Intel
Douglas Melamed 25 mars 2014 Washington DC

Articles

2797 Bulletin

Douglas Melamed, Janet Ridge, William J. Kolasky The Brazilian Antitrust Authority annnounces a new interpretation of the Brazilian merger notification threshold reducing foreign merger filings (ADC Telecommunications / Krone International)

325

Brazilian merger notification requirements, traditionally a major hurdle for multinational mergers, have just become less burdensome. In an unexpected development last Wednesday, the Brazilian antitrust authority (“CADE”) announced a new interpretation of the Brazilian merger notification (...)

Douglas Melamed, James W. Lowe, Thomas Mueller, William J. Kolasky The US Court of Appeals for the Second District invalidates two cards companies rules that prohibit member banks (Visa / MasterCard)

325

Background On September 17, 2003, the Second Circuit issued an important decision in U.S. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 2003 WL 22138519 (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2003). The court affirmed a district court ruling invalidating Visa and Mastercard rules that prohibit member banks from issuing American (...)

Douglas Melamed, James W. Lowe, Leon B. Greenfield, Thomas Mueller The US Court of Appeals rules that marginal cost rather than average variable cost may be an appropriate cost measure in predatory pricing cases (AMR)

343

The Decision in AMR Between 1995 and 1997, several low cost carriers entered certain airline routes between Dallas/Fort Worth Airport and other cities that American Airlines serves and undercut American’s fares. American responded to the new competition by lowering prices and increasing (...)

Ali Stoeppelwerth, Douglas Melamed, James W. Lowe, Leon B. Greenfield, Robert B. Bell, Thomas Mueller, Veronica Kayne The US DOJ demands conduct remedies in the form of establishing firewalls and publishing non-discriminatory criteria before clearing the vertical merger between a satellite producer and a payload supplier (Northrop Grumman / TRW)

117

On December 11, 2002, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a proposed consent decree, permitting Northrop Grumman to proceed with its $7.8 billion acquisition of TRW. Northrop Grumman/TRW shows that the DOJ and the Department of Defense (DOD), which plays a leading role in reviewing (...)

Ali Stoeppelwerth, Douglas Melamed, Leon B. Greenfield, Thomas Mueller The US DOJ fines two US software companies for improperly coordinating their actions before the closing of the merger in violation of the HSR Act and Section 1 of the Sherman Act (CA / Platinum)

1100

The Department of Justice has just brought a case that should cause merging parties to take even greater precautions to ensure they do not improperly coordinate before closing. The DoJ complaint alleges violations both of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act) and (...)

2788 Revue

Douglas Melamed, Randal C. Picker, Philip J. Weiser, Diane Wood Antitrust Law and Trade Regulation, Cases and Materials, A. Douglas MELAMED, Randal C. PICKER, Philip J. WEISER et Diane P. WOOD

184

Cette rubrique Livres recense et commente les ouvrages et autres publications en droit de la concurrence, droit & économie de la concurrence et en droit de la régulation. Une telle recension ne peut par nature être exhaustive et se limite donc à présenter quelques publications récentes (...)

Statistiques


12993
Total des visites

928.1
Nombre de lectures par contribution

14
Nombre de contributions

Classement de l'auteur
722ème
En nombre de contributions
792ème
En nombre total de visites
2769ème
En nombre moyen de visites
Envoyer un message