Dieter Hauck

Lawyer (Partner)

Dieter Hauck is a partner at Preslmayr (Austria). Mr. Hauck specialises in all aspects of Austrian and European competition law, including merger control, advice and defence in cartel and antitrust matters, litigation in cartel and civil courts, matters of abuse of a dominant market position. Damage claims in civil courts following convictions by cartel authorities have become a high profile issue in Austria, accompanied by the Commissions Damage Directive Proposal and amendments to national law. Dieter Hauck has been and is active in the banking, petroleum, pharmaceutical and social security, as well as most recently in the elevator industry. He represents companies and public bodies in cases before the Austrian and European authorities including the European Court of First Instance and the European Court of Justice. A further field of expertise is general EU and public procurement law, which has become very lively in recent years due to Austrian and European legislation. In all these matters sound legal and tactical advice for Dieter Hauck is as essential as solution oriented direct approach, effective case management and quick reactions to challenging situations. E.g. in leniency cases or public procurement appeals, days if not hours may be of essential importance to the outcome of the case.


7553 Revue

Ana Barros Feiteira, Angie Ng, Benoît Merkt, Camilla Jain Holtse, Christian Hagerman, Christian Nielsen, David T. Fischer, Dieter Hauck, Graeme Edgerton, Inigo Igartua, Kiri Tahana, Lesley Farrell, Martijn Snoep, Martin Klusmann, Massimo Merola, Michael Reiss, Nathalie Jalabert-Doury, Nathan J. Muyskens, Nick Taylor, Rayan Houdrouge, Sara Lembo, Serge Bourque, Shreeya Smith, Suzanne Kingston, Teresa Lorca Morales, Tommy Pettersson Digital evidence searches in competition investigations : Best Practices for effective fundamental rights (Results of an international survey among defense lawyers)


An international survey among defense lawyers was lauched under the aegis of Concurrences in order to compare the protections that have been implemented in 15 different jurisdictions to address issues of fundamental rights arising in the frame of digital investigations. A first set of Best (...)


Total des visites

Nombre de lectures par contribution

Nombre de contributions

Classement de l'auteur
En nombre de contributions
En nombre total de visites
En nombre moyen de visites
Envoyer un message