David Maiorana is the IP Litigation Partner at Jones Day. Dave Maiorana represents clients in the area of intellectual property law, focusing primarily on patent infringement litigation and counseling. He has significant experience in Section 337 investigations before the International Trade Commission, representing both complainants and respondents. He has experience in all facets of patent infringement litigation from pre-complaint investigation to appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. Dave also has experience with antitrust/unfair competition claims brought in the context of patent infringement litigation, as well as with alternative dispute resolution of intellectual property matters. As a part of his practice, Dave counsels clients on intellectual property enforcement and defense, including preparing opinions on freedom to practice, invalidity, and inequitable conduct. Dave is a member of the International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association (Intellectual Property Law Section), the American Intellectual Property Law Association, the Cleveland Intellectual Property Law Association, the Ohio State Bar Association, and the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association.
168
Three years after initiating an extensive sector study under section 6(b) of the FTC Act, the Federal Trade Commission has issued its report on the activities of patent assertion entities ("PAEs"). The report, titled Patent Assertion Entity Activity : An FTC Study ("PAE Report"), sets forth (...)
171
This week the Federal Trade Commission issued its long-anticipated report, "The Evolving IP Marketplace : Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies With Competition." The report is seen by the FTC as continuing the "policy engagement with the patent system" that it launched in its controversial (...)
1162
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision with significant implications for the doctrine of patent misuse. The decision issued last week overturns part of a Federal Circuit panel decision last year holding that Philips may have committed patent misuse by (...)
