ALERTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - FRANCHISE - UNILATERAL TERMINATION - TRIAL PERIOD

Unilateral termination: The Commercial Chamber of the French Supreme Court rules out unfair termination of a franchise contract due to the inherent precariousness of the trial period (Dafy Moto / Motostop)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. When the inherent precariousness of the trial period drives out the abuse in the breach of a franchise agreement* The judgment under commentary is interesting because it is the first, to our knowledge, in which the Court of Cassation rules on the increasingly widespread practice of trial periods in franchising (see on this subject, N. Dissaux, "L'essai en matière de franchise", RTD com. 2015, p. 403 et seq.) In May 2011, a professional specialising in the distribution of equipment and accessories for the driving of two-wheeled vehicles entered into a franchise agreement with a company authorising it to operate a sales outlet under its brand. The contract

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Toulouse

Quotation

Lucas Bettoni, Unilateral termination: The Commercial Chamber of the French Supreme Court rules out unfair termination of a franchise contract due to the inherent precariousness of the trial period (Dafy Moto / Motostop), 21 June 2017, Concurrences N° 4-2017, Art. N° 103819, www.concurrences.com

Visites 71

All reviews