For some authors, the person responsible under civil law would obey to some principles that are incompatible with those of the competition law. This opinion, however, must be resisted. This article aims to show that the presence, in competition law, of texts designating "the undertaking" as the entity responsible for the anti-competitive practice , enables the civil law to have the same original solutions of competition law. The civil judge may well recognize, even in autonomous actions, that are liable to pay compensation, legal entities constituting the undertaking. This should not be confused with the question of whether it can or should apply the parental presumption which is so much discussed. This second question is much more delicate.
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in