CASE COMMENT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES

Discriminatory practices: The Paris Court of Appeal confirms the decision of the French Competition Authority which had declared unfounded the allegations of abuse of dominant position formulated by a television magazine editing company which considered that the distribution prices applied to its company were discriminatory compared to those applied to its main competitor (NMPP)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. We will see the judgment in the case between the publishing company of the television magazine Télé Z to the company Nouvelles messageries de

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Discriminatory practices: The Paris Court of Appeal confirms the decision of the French Competition Authority which had declared unfounded the allegations of abuse of dominant position formulated by a television magazine editing company which considered that the distribution prices applied to its company were discriminatory compared to those applied to its main competitor (NMPP), 12 July 2008, Concurrences N° 4-2008, Art. N° 64058, www.concurrences.com

Visites 103

All reviews