CASE COMMENTS: INTERNATIONAL POLICY - USA - EXTRATERRITORITORIALITY OF US ANTITRUST LAW

Extraterritoriality of US antitrust law: The Court of Appeals of Columbia rules and concludes the Empagran saga (Empagran / Hoffmann-Laroche)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Empagran SA v. F. Hoffmann-Laroche Ltd, (No. 01-7115), decided on June 28, 2005 On June 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Washington, D.C.) issued a ruling that ends the international controversy over a claim for damages in a civil class action by non-U.S. victims of the international vitamin cartel sued by the DOJ Antitrust Division beginning in 1997. A three-judge panel of the Washington Court of Appeals has ruled that vitamin purchasers cannot bring claims under US antitrust law for alleged damages suffered as a result of the activity of the global vitamin cartel. This

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

François Souty, Extraterritoriality of US antitrust law: The Court of Appeals of Columbia rules and concludes the Empagran saga (Empagran / Hoffmann-Laroche), 28 June 2005, Concurrences N° 4-2005, Art. N° 620, pp. 131-133.

Visites 5213

All reviews