CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRATICES - LIABILITY OF A PARENT COMPANY FOR PRACTICES OF ITS SUBSIDIARY - CHOLINE CHLORURE

Parent company’s liability: The Advocate General Julianne Kokott reads the ECJ Stora case law (Akzo Nobel)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The choline chloride judgment which the Court of Justice is expected to deliver shortly is

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Rizom Legal (Paris)
    France 327 contributions 456846 visits

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Parent company’s liability: The Advocate General Julianne Kokott reads the ECJ Stora case law (Akzo Nobel), 23 April 2009, Concurrences N° 3-2009, Art. N° 28225, p. 81

Visites 2489

All reviews