Interested party: The Court of Justice of the European Union holds that the competition report alone is not sufficient to establish that an undertaking is actually individually concerned by the contested decision or that it suffers a substantial adverse effect giving it a remedy (Lufthansa)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Court of Justice dismisses an appeal against an order of the Court of First Instance dismissing the case and examines, in particular, the question whether Deutsche Lufthansa AG ["hereinafter Lufthansa"] was substantially affected by aid which had been granted to Frankfurt-Hahn airport in Germany. Factual framework Frankfurt-Hahn Airport was a military airfield that was converted to civilian use with the help of public funds in 1992. The public funds consisted of numerous measures implemented at different times, mainly in the form of credit lines, loans and guarantees. Until 2017, the state of Rheinland-Pfalz held a majority stake of 82.5% in FFHG, the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Brussels)
  • Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Brussels)

Quotation

Jacques Derenne, Nour el-Houda Bey, Interested party: The Court of Justice of the European Union holds that the competition report alone is not sufficient to establish that an undertaking is actually individually concerned by the contested decision or that it suffers a substantial adverse effect giving it a remedy (Lufthansa), 20 January 2022, Concurrences N° 2-2022, Art. N° 106593, pp. 155-156

Visites 71

All reviews