Essential infrastructure: The Advocate General Rantos invites the Court of Justice of the European Union to reject the application of the three cumulative criteria of the Bronner judgment to the eviction behaviour of the Lithuanian incumbent railway operator, considering that it is not a case of "refusal of access" to an infrastructure but rather a case of predatory behaviour (Lietuvos geležinkeliai)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On July 7, 2022, Advocate General Athanasios Rantos presented his conclusions in Case C-42/21 (Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission). In his opinion, the Advocate General asks the Court of Justice of the European Union to dismiss the appeal lodged by Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB (LG), which seeks the annulment of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 November 2020 in Case T-814/17 (Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commission). In that judgment, the Court of First Instance, considering that the conduct of the national railway company on the Lithuanian rail freight market did not fall within the scope of the case law on refusal of access to

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Essential infrastructure: The Advocate General Rantos invites the Court of Justice of the European Union to reject the application of the three cumulative criteria of the Bronner judgment to the eviction behaviour of the Lithuanian incumbent railway operator, considering that it is not a case of "refusal of access" to an infrastructure but rather a case of predatory behaviour (Lietuvos geležinkeliai), 7 July 2022, Concurrences N° 2-2022, Art. N° 107389, www.concurrences.com

Visites 115

All reviews