CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - AGREEMENT - EFFECT ON TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

Franchise: The Court of Appeal of Paris refuses to condemn a franchise on the basis of Article 81 TEC (Jean-Louis David)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Cour d’appel de Paris, 21 septembre 2005

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. As for the litigation concerning a hairdressing franchise

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 4525 contributions 1119457 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Franchise: The Court of Appeal of Paris refuses to condemn a franchise on the basis of Article 81 TEC (Jean-Louis David), 21 September 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 54593, www.concurrences.com

Visites 105

All reviews