Sanctions: The Paris Court of Appeal essentially confirms the findings of the French Competition Authority regarding the price and market sharing agreement implemented by the main compote manufacturers, while significantly reducing the fines imposed (Andros, Coroos...)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On October 6, 2022, the Chamber 5-7 of the Paris Court of Appeal issued another ruling, this time in the compotes case. Several companies have appealed against decision n° 19-D-24 of December 17, 2019 58 million for having implemented, between October 2010 and January 2014, an anti-competitive practice by object aiming, on the one hand, at manipulating the prices of compotes sold to the mass retailing under private labels and to the distributors of the out-of-home catering (RHF) and, on the other hand, at sharing out, for these same products, the customers and the volumes The case began in January 2014 with a leniency application filed by a Dutch fruit

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Sanctions: The Paris Court of Appeal essentially confirms the findings of the French Competition Authority regarding the price and market sharing agreement implemented by the main compote manufacturers, while significantly reducing the fines imposed (Andros, Coroos...), 6 October 2022, Concurrences N° 4-2022, Art. N° 109101, www.concurrences.com

Visites 159

All reviews