CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES - REFORMATION - NON-COMPLIANCE WITH COMMITMENTS

Reformation: The Paris Court of Appeal reverses for the first time a decision of the French Competition Authority sanctioning a company for non-compliance with commitments (GIE PMU)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The decision of the Paris Court of Appeal on September 2, 2021, which fully reversed a decision of the French Competition Authority [the "Authority"] sanctioning a company for non-compliance with commitments made to it, concerns a case that is almost a decade old. Feedback on the commitments given and the procedure for non-compliance before the Authority Less than two years after the liberalisation of the online betting sector, resulting from Law 2010-476 of 12 May 2010 on the opening up to competition and the regulation of the online gambling sector, the company Betclic Everest Group ["Betclic"] had lodged a complaint with the Autorité concerning

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Ashurst (Paris)
  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne

Quotation

Marie Florent, Christophe Lemaire, Reformation: The Paris Court of Appeal reverses for the first time a decision of the French Competition Authority sanctioning a company for non-compliance with commitments (GIE PMU), 2 September 2021, Concurrences N° 4-2021, Art. N° 103500, pp. 147-150

Visites 105

All reviews