CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES - FRANCE - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE - SETTLEMENT

Settlement: The French Supreme Court rejects any infringement of the rights of defence in the context of hybrid transaction proceedings before the French Competition Authority (La Caisse des dépôts et consignations)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. By a decision dated 26 February 2015, the Competition Authority had taken up ex officio matters relating to practices implemented on the land assistance market of the public land institution of the Western Rhône-Alpes region (hereinafter 'EPORA'). The Authority was alerted by an investigation report from the DGCCRF, which revealed a market sharing between the company Services conseil expertises territoires ["SCET"], a subsidiary of the Caisse des dépôts et consignations group ["CDC"], and the company SETIS ["SETIS"], a subsidiary of the Degaud group. While the two companies had each concluded a framework agreement with EPORA covering areas awarded to them

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Alexandre Marescaux, Settlement: The French Supreme Court rejects any infringement of the rights of defence in the context of hybrid transaction proceedings before the French Competition Authority (La Caisse des dépôts et consignations), 24 June 2020, Concurrences N° 4-2020, Art. N° 97877, www.concurrences.com

Visites 40

All reviews