Previous article Next article

ALERTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - FRANCE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - FINES

Fines: The French Supreme Court confirmes in the ’zinc case’ that the omission concerning the offender’s membership of a powerful group constituted a material error which the Court of Appeal was entitled to rectify (Umicore)

New

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a judgment delivered on 2 September 2020The Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation, rejecting the appeals lodged by the Umicore group - the appeal lodged by the Chairman of the Authority, which was considered late, was declared inadmissible - not only confirms the judgment handed down on 17 May 2018, but also confirms thedecision of the Court of Cassation in the case of the Umicore group. by the Paris Court of Appeal essentially confirming Decision No. 16-D-14 of 23 June 2016 concerning practices in the rolled zinc and zinc products for construction, but also thejudgment dated 5 July 2018 under the terms of which the Paris Court of Appeal had

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Fines: The French Supreme Court confirmes in the ’zinc case’ that the omission concerning the offender’s membership of a powerful group constituted a material error which the Court of Appeal was entitled to rectify (Umicore), 2 September 2020, Concurrences N° 4-2020, Art. N° 96714, www.concurrences.com

Visites 60

All reviews