ALERTS: DISTRIBUTION – DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT – SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION – TERMINATION OF SUPPLY CONTRACT

Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects the claim for compensation by evicted dealers for wrongful breach of contract and wrongful refusal of approval (Safirauto / 74 Diffusion Auto)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The judgment under review is an opportunity to review both the contours of the fault committed at the time of a breach of a distribution agreement and the lawfulness of a refusal of approval to a candidate for entry into the network, issues which fuel a rather plethoric dispute (if the dispute of abusive breach is long-standing - cf. the decisions cited below -, that of approval is more recent, at least in terms of the law of obligations - cf. our focus in Lettre distribu. 04/2019, p. 1). Facts and procedure. The facts reported are standard. An importer of new vehicles and spare parts of a well-known Japanese brand terminates all distribution contracts

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Toulouse

Quotation

Lucas Bettoni, Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects the claim for compensation by evicted dealers for wrongful breach of contract and wrongful refusal of approval (Safirauto / 74 Diffusion Auto), 24 June 2020, Concurrences N° 4-2020, Art. N° 97115, www.concurrences.com

Visites 33

All reviews