ALERTS: DISTRIBUTION - CENTRAL CONTRACTING AGENCY - SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE - DAMAGES

Advantages without counterpart: The Paris Court of Appeal condemns a Referencing Centre to return to a supplier the commissions received from it, failing to demonstrate the reality of the services allegedly rendered (Label G2 / Centragroup Fareva )

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Facts. In 1998, the supplier Label G2 had entered into a commercial relationship with a customer, the company Excelvision, from which it sold its products. Following the acquisition of Excelvision by the Fareva Group, commercial negotiations were no longer to be conducted between Label G2 and Excelvision, but between Label G2 and a referencing centre, the company Centragroup Fareva, whose function was to negotiate the terms of purchases between suppliers and the companies of the Fareva Group. The intervention of the central purchasing office initially gave rise to a brokerage agreement concluded on 17 February 2005 and then, in a second phase, to a

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Jean-Michel Vertut - Avocat (Montpellier)

Quotation

Jean-Michel Vertut, Advantages without counterpart: The Paris Court of Appeal condemns a Referencing Centre to return to a supplier the commissions received from it, failing to demonstrate the reality of the services allegedly rendered (Label G2 / Centragroup Fareva ), 27 February 2020, Concurrences N° 4-2020, Art. N° 97124, www.concurrences.com

Visites 96

All reviews