CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – FRANCE - SUDDEN BREAK - PRICE – DISAGREEMENT

Sudden break: The French Supreme Court rules that in the event of a persistent disagreement on the purchase price of a wine vintage, the termination may not be attributed to either party (Château Baret)

L’espèce était assez originale et mérite un peu d’explications. Un château dans le bordelais (Chateau Baret) était en relation commerciale avec un négociant depuis une trentaine d’années sans aucune raison d’en changer. Le millésime 2009 sera un casus belli entre les parties. Le

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Sudden break: The French Supreme Court rules that in the event of a persistent disagreement on the purchase price of a wine vintage, the termination may not be attributed to either party (Château Baret), 3 July 2019, Concurrences Review N° 4-2019, Art. N° 92387, p. 118

Visites 52

All reviews