CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – FRANCE – COOPERATIVE – EXCLUSION

Exclusion: The French Supreme Court rejects the application of Article L. 442-6, I, 5° of the French Commercial Code to the exclusion of a cooperative member (Système U Centrale Régionale Est / Les Magasins longoviciens)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Case law offers a new example of a restriction on the application of article L. 442-6 C. com. based on the existence of a special regulation and not on the impossible characterisation of the conditions of implementation of this provision (see not., Cass. com, Oct. 23, 2007, No. 06-16774, Bull. civ. IV, No. 20, retaining the exclusion of the application of article L. 442-6, I, 5° C. com. to the termination of the contractual relationship existing between a clinic and surgeons - Cass. com., Jan. 20, 2009, No. 07-17556, excluding the application of this provision to notaries - Cass. com., Nov. 24, 2015, No. 14-22578, Concurrences No. 1-2016, p. 124,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Exclusion: The French Supreme Court rejects the application of Article L. 442-6, I, 5° of the French Commercial Code to the exclusion of a cooperative member (Système U Centrale Régionale Est / Les Magasins longoviciens), 16 May 2018, Concurrences N° 4-2018, Art. N° 88287, pp. 135-136

Visites 152

All reviews