Arbitration clause: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the possible significant imbalance of a commercial relationship has no effect on the validity of an arbitration clause because of the autonomy of the clause in relation to the contract that contains it (Subway)

Fourgoux, Jean-Louis

Previous article Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal establishes the conditions under which the single convention may be modified (Ministre de l’Économie / Système U) Next article Large retail stores: The French Parliament examines a legislative proposal aiming to protect city-centre small shops against the excessive establishment of large retail stores (Legislative proposal n°1115)

CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – FRANCE – SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE – ARBITRATION CLAUSE – EXEQUATUR

11 Sep 2018

Arbitration clause: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the possible significant imbalance of a commercial relationship has no effect on the validity of an arbitration clause because of the autonomy of the clause in relation to the contract that contains it (Subway)

KEYWORDS

Reference

Paris Court of Appeal, Sept. 11th, 2018, Subway, RG n° 16/19913

La Cour d’appel de Paris a fait application de la jurisprudence constante limitant la contestation de la validité d’une clause compromissoire dans une hypothèse néanmoins originale à l’occasion du contrôle de l’ordonnance d’exequatur d’une sentence arbitrale. Un franchisé

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Author

Jean-Louis Fourgoux
Fourgoux, Djavadi & Associés (Paris)

France 117 articles 64584 visits

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Arbitration clause: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the possible significant imbalance of a commercial relationship has no effect on the validity of an arbitration clause because of the autonomy of the clause in relation to the contract that contains it (Subway), 11 September 2018, Concurrences Review N° 4-2018, Art. N° 88286, p. 135

Visites 48