CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – FRANCE – SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE – ARBITRATION CLAUSE – EXEQUATUR

Arbitration clause: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the possible significant imbalance of a commercial relationship has no effect on the validity of an arbitration clause because of the autonomy of the clause in relation to the contract that contains it (Subway)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Paris Court of Appeal, Sept. 11th, 2018, Subway, RG n° 16/19913

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Paris Court of Appeal has applied the established case law limiting the challenge to the validity of an arbitration clause in a case

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Arbitration clause: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the possible significant imbalance of a commercial relationship has no effect on the validity of an arbitration clause because of the autonomy of the clause in relation to the contract that contains it (Subway), 11 September 2018, Concurrences N° 4-2018, Art. N° 88286, p. 135

Visites 183

All reviews