CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES – EUROPEAN UNION – EXCLUSIONARY ABUSE – LEVERAGE EFFECT – PRICE COMPARATOR

Exclusionary abuse: The European Commission fines the dominant operator of online research market for abusing dominance by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service (Google Shopping)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Eur. Comm., Press release, June 27th, 2017, Commission fines Google €2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. It will be appropriate to come back in a future issue of Concurrences on the European Commission's decision in the Google Shopping case. The text of this decision of 27 June 2017 had not yet been published at the time of writing. It

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Frédéric Marty, Exclusionary abuse: The European Commission fines the dominant operator of online research market for abusing dominance by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service (Google Shopping), 27 June 2017, Concurrences N° 4-2017, Art. N° 85214, p. 101

Visites 445

All reviews