CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - CONTRACTUAL GROUND OF ACTION – SUDDEN TERMINATION – SPECIALISED JURISDICTION

Specialised jurisdiction: The French Supreme Court holds that an action based on contractual provisions may defeat exclusive jurisdiction of specialised courts to hear actions based on Article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code (GTM c/ Speedy France)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The ruling handed down on 21 June 2017 by the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation testifies to the difficulty of implementing the monopoly conferred on the specialised courts to hear disputes relating to Article L. 442-6 C. com. under the rules of civil procedure. It also underlines the essential importance of the basis invoked in a dispute relating to the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Specialised jurisdiction: The French Supreme Court holds that an action based on contractual provisions may defeat exclusive jurisdiction of specialised courts to hear actions based on Article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code (GTM c/ Speedy France), 21 June 2017, Concurrences N° 4-2017, Art. N° 85203, pp. 125-126

Visites 91

All reviews