*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 20 July 2017, Advocate General Paolo Mengozzi presented his Opinion on the conclusions in Case C-127/16 (SNCF Mobilités v. European Commission). These conclusions follow the appeal brought by SNCF against the Commission of the European Communities (hereinafter 'the Commission').Judgment given on 17 December 2015 in Case T-242/12 (SNCF v Commission)in favour of which the Court of First Instance of the European Union dismissed the action brought by SNCF seeking annulment of the Commission Decision of 9 March 2012. This decision of 9 March 2012 concerned the implementation of another Commission decision - the Sernam 2 decision - according to which the
ALERT: STATE AID - INCOMPATIBLE AID - RESTRUCTURING AID - DEBT WAIVER - PRIVATE INVESTOR TEST
Incompatible aid: The Advocate General Mengozzi invites the Court of justice of the European Union to dismiss the appeal brought by the French incumbent rail operator in the case of the reorganisation of its subsidiary specializing in luggage and parcel transportation (Hoffmann-La Roche)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.