*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Article L. 442-6-I-5° of the Commercial Code is definitely not (any longer) the lifeline for companies that intend to challenge the termination of their relationship in court. The decision handed down by the Paris Court of Appeal on 5 July 2017 (Pôle 5 Chambre 4, No. 17/08926)In the event that the unsuccessful party intends to obtain a temporary continuation of the business relationship in summary proceedings, this is evidenced by the fact that the unsuccessful party is seeking to obtain a temporary continuation of the business relationship in summary proceedings. In the present case, an operator engaged in the activity of port stevedore in Le Havre,
ALERT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - SUDDEN BREACH OF LONG-TERM CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP - SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE - EMERGENCY PROCEDURE
Emergency procedure: The Paris court of appeal rejects a complaint relating to an alleged sudden breach of long-term contractual relationship (Terminaux de Normandie et al./NYK Group Europe et al.)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.