CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – ATTRIBUTION – SEPARATE INSTANCE

Specialized Courts: The French Supreme Court holds that the breach of Article D. 442-6 of the Commercial Code is punishable by a plea of non-admissibility and affirms the impossibility of a separate instance (Alstom Switzerland, Alstom Holdings, Alstom / UAPE Holdings Usines Applications Poly Expases)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In order to carry out energy projects in Russia, several companies of the Alstom Group and UAPE Holding Usines Applications Poly Expanses have concluded several cooperation protocols and preparatory agreements. The purpose of these agreements is the construction of hydroelectric power stations during 2004 and 2005. The projects were eventually abandoned. Some five years later, UAPE, considering itself aggrieved by this abandonment, sued the companies involved in the project before the Commercial Court of Nanterre. As part of this action, UAPE sought payment of damages to compensate for its

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Specialized Courts: The French Supreme Court holds that the breach of Article D. 442-6 of the Commercial Code is punishable by a plea of non-admissibility and affirms the impossibility of a separate instance (Alstom Switzerland, Alstom Holdings, Alstom / UAPE Holdings Usines Applications Poly Expases), 6 September 2016, Concurrences Nº 4-2016, Art. N° 82070, pp. 128-129

Visites 140

All reviews