*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The commented judgment, delivered on a question referred for a preliminary ruling, confirms that the Court, even in purely internal situations, is rarely reluctant to teach Union law when the aim is to ensure its uniform interpretation (see, in particular, CJEU 26 November 2015, Maxima Latvija, Case C-345/14point 12). In the present case, the Latvian Supreme Court had referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation
CASE COMMENTS: CARTELS – EUROPEAN UNION - LIABILITY OF A COMPANY FOR ANTICOMPETITIVE BEHAVIOUR OF A SERVICE PROVIDER
Purely internal situation: The Court of Justice of the European Union clarifies the limited conditions under which a company can be held liable for the anticompetitive behavior of a service provider (SIA “VM Remonts”)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.