CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – PRE-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION OF INFORMATION – ARTICLE L. 330-3 C. COM.

Exclusivity or quasi-exclusivity: The Paris Court of Appeals specifies the scope of the pre-contractual obligation of information bearing on the manufacturer (B&O)

KEYWORDS
Reference

CA Paris, 8 juin 2016, B&O, RG n° 13/14520

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Litigation at the initiative of the defeated distributor hoping to challenge the validity of the distribution contract is not weakening... In a recent case, a distributor placed in receivership sought

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Dominique Ferré, Exclusivity or quasi-exclusivity: The Paris Court of Appeals specifies the scope of the pre-contractual obligation of information bearing on the manufacturer (B&O), 8 June 2016, Concurrences Nº 4-2016, Art. N° 82060, p. 115

Visites 302

All reviews