*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 28 July 2016, Advocate General Henrick Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered his Opinion. in the famous Case C-411/15 (Timab Industries, Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v Commission of the European Communities). Called upon to rule solely on the questions of the scope of the full jurisdiction conferred on the Court of First Instance and of respect for the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment, in the specific context of a hybrid situation, where a settlement procedure and an ordinary procedure took place in parallel, the Advocate General calls upon the Court of Justice of the European Union to reject the third
ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - SETTLEMENT - LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION - EQUAL TREATMENT - FULL JURISDICTION
Settlement: Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe invites the Court of Justice of the European Union to reject the appeal by a financial group in the animal feed phosphates cartel case (Timab/Roullier)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.