ALERT: PROCEDURE - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE - EVIDENCE - ILLEGALLY OBTAINED RECORDINGS

Proof of an infringement: The General Court of the European Union rules that illegally obtained recording may be used as evidence of an infringement of article 101 TFEU (Goldfish)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 8 September 2016, the Court of First Instance of the European Union handed down an interesting judgement http://curia.europa.eu/juris/docume... in Case T-54/14 (Goldfish BV and Others v Commission). In that case, the Court of First Instance adopted an approach which contrasts with that adopted by the French Cour de Cassation on the question of the admission as evidence of an illegally obtained recording of telephone conversations. One remembers that in a decision http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-cont... of 27 November 2013, the European Commission imposed a fine totalling EUR 28 716 000 on four North Sea shrimp traders for their participation in a

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Proof of an infringement: The General Court of the European Union rules that illegally obtained recording may be used as evidence of an infringement of article 101 TFEU (Goldfish), 8 September 2016, Concurrences Nº 4-2016, Art. N° 82205, www.concurrences.com

Visites 240

All reviews