ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - EVIDENCE - INTERIM MEASURES - TENDERS - FORECLOSURE

Lack of evidence: The French Competition Authority rejects a complaint relating to practices in the sector of portable extinguishers and the corresponding request for interim measures (ADMIS)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Autorité de la concurrence, 13 septembre 2016, affaire 16-D-19 (ADMIS)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 13 September 2016, the Competition Authority issued Decision No. 16-D-19 on practices in the installation and maintenance of portable fire extinguishers. Essentially, the Association des distributeurs de matériel incendie et sécurité (ADMIS), which brings together installers, the majority of whom are not APSAD or APSAD-NF Service certified,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 4538 contributions 1120455 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Lack of evidence: The French Competition Authority rejects a complaint relating to practices in the sector of portable extinguishers and the corresponding request for interim measures (ADMIS), 13 September 2016, Concurrences Nº 4-2016, Art. N° 82166, www.concurrences.com

Visites 135

All reviews