ALERT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - DISTRIBUTION - APPEAL - FAKE COMMERCIAL COOPERATION - ABRUPT AND ABUSIVE TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONS - EXCLUSIVE LICENCE

Distribution: The Paris Court of appeal renders three decisions, two of which involve fake commercial cooperation (Système U/Jambons du Cotentin/Coty/Brandalley)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 29 June 2016, Chamber 5-4 of the Paris Court of Appeal handed down three judgments on distribution, two of which relate to practices restricting competition. The first stop on June 29, 2016 is about a trading partner obtaining a non-existent advantage. At the end of the present judgment, Chamber 5-4 of the Paris Court of Appeal confirms the judgment delivered on October 24, 2006 by which the Commercial Court of Créteil, seized by the Minister of the Economy, stated that the company Système U Centrale Nationale had obtained from the four suppliers Danone, Nestlé, Yoplait and Lavazza, during 2002 and 2003, advantages not corresponding to any specific

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Distribution: The Paris Court of appeal renders three decisions, two of which involve fake commercial cooperation (Système U/Jambons du Cotentin/Coty/Brandalley), 29 June 2016, Concurrences Nº 4-2016, Art. N° 82182, www.concurrences.com

Visites 255

All reviews