CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - ART. L. 442-6-I-2° C. COM. – NEGOTIATION
Significant imbalance : The French Supreme Court renders a decision that provides new clarifications on the rule prohibiting significant imbalance (GALEC)
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.
Published in the Bulletin, the decision handed down on 27 May 2015 by the Court of Cassation (Cass. com., 27 May 2015, No. 14-11387, Galec, France).), constitutes, after the two judgments of 3 March 2015 (Cass. com., 3 March 2015, No. 14-10.907, Provera France and No. 13-27.525 Eurochan), a new piece of the jurisprudential construction relating to Article L. 442-6-I-2° of the Commercial Code (for a combined analysis of these three decisions, see RTD Com. 2015, No. 3, obs. M. Chagny).
This rule, which stems from the LME, is based on two constituent elements, namely, on the one hand,
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in