CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - ART. N° L.442-6 I 5° C. COM. –ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

Economic dependence : The French Supreme Court dismisses the appeal filed by a supplier who required a longer notice period due to economic dependency and approves of the trial courts reproaching the supplier for not having explained the diversification of his activities and its risks (Nord Staff Bricolage, Leroy Merlin)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Cass. com., 7 juill. 2015, Nord Staff Bricolage c/ Leroy Merlin, n° 14-17657

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.