CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - ART. L. 442-6-I-2° C. COM. – NEGOTIATION

Significant imbalance : The French Supreme Court renders a decision that provides new clarifications on the rule prohibiting significant imbalance (GALEC)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Published in the Bulletin, the decision handed down on 27 May 2015 by the Court of Cassation (Cass. com., 27 May 2015, No. 14-11387, Galec, France).), constitutes, after the two judgments of 3 March 2015 (Cass. com., 3 March 2015, No. 14-10.907, Provera France and No. 13-27.525 Eurochan), a new piece of the jurisprudential construction relating to Article L. 442-6-I-2° of the Commercial Code (for a combined analysis of these three decisions, see RTD Com. 2015, No. 3, obs. M. Chagny). This rule, which stems from the LME, is based on two constituent elements, namely, on the one hand,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Significant imbalance : The French Supreme Court renders a decision that provides new clarifications on the rule prohibiting significant imbalance (GALEC), 27 May 2015, Concurrences N° 4-2015, Art. N° 76123, pp. 138-139

Visites 297

All reviews