CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION - FRANCHISING - PRE-CONTRACUAL INFORMATION

Franchise : The Paris, Montpellier and Riom Courts of Appeals consider that a bank does not have to warn a franchisee when the franchisor provides non relevant pre-contractual information (Lunois, Crédit Du Nord, Banque Populaire Occitane, Slimless, BNP Paribas)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a previous column, attention was drawn to a decision of the Paris Court of Appeal which had originally decided that a bank in relation with the manager and guarantor of a franchised company "should have drawn the attention of[ this client] to the inadequacy of the pre-contractual information file[…], in view of Article L. 330-3 of the Commercial Code, and that

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Nicolas Éréséo, Franchise : The Paris, Montpellier and Riom Courts of Appeals consider that a bank does not have to warn a franchisee when the franchisor provides non relevant pre-contractual information (Lunois, Crédit Du Nord, Banque Populaire Occitane, Slimless, BNP Paribas), 8 July 2015, Concurrences N° 4-2015, Art. N° 76083, p. 136

Visites 117

All reviews