CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES - LENIENCY – ECN – FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

ECN : The Advocate General Wathelet suggests that the Court of Justice of the European Union observe the procedural autonomy of Member States and their competition authorities when adopting leniency programmes, subject to the respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the general principles of the European Union (DHL)

Dans ses conclusions, l’Avocat général Wathelet suggère à la Cour de répondre au Conseil d’État italien que le programme modèle en matière de clémence du Réseau européen de la concurrence (REC) de 2006 n’a pas d’effet contraignant à l’égard des autorités nationales de concurrence (ANC). Toutefois, lorsqu’un État membre adopte un programme de clémence, basé ou non sur ce programme modèle (principe de l’autonomie procédurale), il doit respecter le droit de

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Alexandre Lacresse, ECN : The Advocate General Wathelet suggests that the Court of Justice of the European Union observe the procedural autonomy of Member States and their competition authorities when adopting leniency programmes, subject to the respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the general principles of the European Union (DHL), 10 September 2015, Concurrences Review N° 4-2015, Art. N° 76378, p. 181

Visites 131

All reviews