Competition law is subject to a dual pseudo-contradictory movement. On the one hand, it hardens as competition authorities pronounce increasingly severe sanctions. On the other hand, it becomes more flexible, as authoritarian intervention methods leave room for methods that involve active participation of sued companies. These methods, sometimes designated as "negotiated procedures" or "procedures accessory or alternative to sanctions", are worth observing. They have many virtues, both from the point of view of competition authorities, whose action becomes more efficient, and from the point of view of economic operators, who are thus held more responsible but whose sanctions can also, under some conditions, be reduced or cancelled. However, these procedures can have setbacks: they lead to a loss of values, contribute to the devitalisation of the area and can harm procedural rights of the parties. Therefore, it is vital to keep a watchful eye on these methods.
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in