ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE – PRICE-FIXING - MARKET-SHARING - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE - PROOF OF PARTICIPATION IN THE CARTEL - SINGLE AND CONTINUOUS INFRINGEMENT - PROPORTIONALITY - FINES

Principle that penalties must fit the offence: The Tribunal of the European Union confirms most of the Commission’s decision in the cathode ray tubes cartel case, but lowers the fines imposed on two of the participants (Panasonic/Samsung/Toshiba/Philips/LG)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Court of First Instance, 9 September 2015, Cases T-82/13 (Panasonic v. MTPD), T-84/13 (Samsung SDI)T-91/13 (LG Electronics), T-92/13 (Philips) and T-104/13 (Toshiba) On 9 September 2015, the General Court of the Union delivered a series of five judgments in Cases T-82/13 (Panasonic v. MTPD), T-84/13 (Samsung SDI)T-91/13 (LG Electronics)T-92/13 (Philips) and T-104/13 (Toshiba) concerning actions brought by five manufacturers of cathode-ray television picture tubes fined by the Commission, in a decision of 5 December 2012, EUR 1.47 billion (the highest cartel fines ever imposed) for their participation in one or two separate cartels fixing prices, sharing

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.