ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - ATTRIBUTABILITY OF THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF A SUBSIDIARY TO THE PARENT COMPANY - PROPORTIONALITY - PRINCIPLE THAT PENALTIES MUST FIT THE OFFENCE - COOPERATION DURING THE PROCEDURE - ABILITY TO PAY
Principle that penalties must fit the offence: The Tribunal of the European Union lowers considerably the fine imposed on one of the participants to the pre-stressing steel cartel (Voestalpine et al.)
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.
Court of First Instance, 15 July 2015, Case T-418/10 (Voestalpine), Joined Cases T-389/10 and T-419/10 (Siderurgica Latina Martin), Cases T-398/10 (Fapricela), T-422/10 (Trafilerie Meridionali)and T-393/10 (Westfälische Drahtindustrie)
On 15 July 2015, the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered no less than 16 judgments in three different cartel cases.
It first delivered a series of 10 judgments (Cases T-389/10 and T-419/10, on the one hand, and Cases T-413/10 and T-414/10, on the other hand, were joined) concerning a first round of 12 out of the 28 appeals lodged against the decision of 30 June 2010.The Commission has since corrected
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in