ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - OBLIGATION TO STATE REASONS - PUBLICATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISIONS - CONFIDENTIALITY - OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY - LENIENCY- LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS - EQUAL TREATMENT

Confidentiality: The Tribunal of the European Union confirms the possibility for the Commission to publish any information not protected by professional secrecy in the non confidential versions of its decisions (AGC, Pilkington)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Court of First Instance, 15 July 2015, Cases T-465/12 (AGC) and T-462/12 (Pilkington) The European Court of Justice also handed down two judgments on 15 July 2015 concerning the cartel of car lenses. However, the actions brought on the one hand by AGC Glass Europe SA and others inCase T-465/12 and, second, by Pilkington Group Ltd in Case T-462/12 are not directed against the decision on the substance of 12 November 2008 by which the Commission imposed penalties on several manufacturers of automotive glass, including the applicants, Pilkington and AGC Glass, but against two decisions of 6 August 2012 by which the Hearing Officer, ruling on the applicants'

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.