CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS - LIABILITY OF A PARENT COMPANY FOR THE INFRINGEMENT COMMITTED BY ITS SUBSIDIARY – PRESUMPTION OF DECISIVE INFLUENCE

Imputability: The General Court of the European Union annuls part of a Commission’s decision due to the erroneous finding of the liability of two parent companies for their joint venture’s infringement (RWE)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Much has been written in the first two commentaries on the Esso Société anonyme française and Others v Commission and Sasol and Others v Commission judgments, which is dealt with in the RWE and RWE Dea v Commission judgment. The references mentioned in those comments will enable the reader to refer to the relevant points of the judgment now annotated. The focus will therefore be on what makes it specific, i.e. the answer to the question of the exact application by the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Philippe Christienne, Imputability: The General Court of the European Union annuls part of a Commission’s decision due to the erroneous finding of the liability of two parent companies for their joint venture’s infringement (RWE), 11 July 2014, Concurrences N° 4-2014, Art. N° 69852, pp. 125-126

Visites 143

All reviews