CASE COMMENT : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - ACCESS RIGHT – REFERENCING - CENTRAL PURCHASING – RIGHT OF ACCESS WITHOUT ORDERS – RESTITUTION - THE BURDEN OF PROOF

Referencing: The Cour de cassation approves the Paris Court of Appeal’s decision to cancel a referencing agreement (Brake France service/Aprest)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In 2004, Aprest, the central purchasing office of a food supply group, awarded a contract to a supplier to supply a catering clientele affiliated to this group. The listing contract provided that 'in consideration for the priority given to

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Referencing: The Cour de cassation approves the Paris Court of Appeal’s decision to cancel a referencing agreement (Brake France service/Aprest), 25 June 2013, Concurrences N° 4-2013, Art. N° 59277, p. 104

Visites 226

All reviews