CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT – IMPUTABILITY – PRESUMPTION OF ACTUAL EXERCISE OF DECISIVE INFLUENCE – CONCEPT OF AN UNDERTAKING

Imputability : The CJEU annuls the GCEU judgment in so far as it concluded that the parent company did not exercise a decisive influence on its subsidiary (Gosselin Group)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CJEU, 11 July 2013, Ziegler v Commission, C-439/11 P CJEU, 11 July 2013, Commission v Stichting Administratiekantoor Portilje, C-440/11 P CJEU, 11 July 2013, Team Relocations and others v Commission, C-444/11 P Several appeals against the judgments of the General Court of 16 June 2011 concerning the cartel on the market for international removals in Belgium (Cases T-199/08, T-208/08 and T-209/08, T-204/08 and T-212/08, see this column).), the Court dismisses in their entirety those brought in Cases C-429/11 P, C-439/11 P and C-444/11 P. On the other hand, as regards the appeal brought by the Commission in Case C-440/10 P, the Court, first, upholds it

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Imputability : The CJEU annuls the GCEU judgment in so far as it concluded that the parent company did not exercise a decisive influence on its subsidiary (Gosselin Group), 11 July 2013, Concurrences N° 4-2013, Art. N° 59089, p. 76

Visites 509

All reviews