CASE COMMENT : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - SUDDEN BREACH - LETTERS FROM THE AUTHOR OF THE BREACH

Sudden breach: The Cour de cassation considers sudden rupture resulting from the obscure and vague indication of the intention of the author to continue the relationship (Taurisson/BMW France)

KEYWORDS
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, 14.05.2013, Taurisson v. BMW France, No. 12-15.390 A car dealership contract entered into on October 1, 2003 for a period of 5 years stipulated that each party had to notify the other party at least 6 months before the end of the term of the contract of its intention not to renew

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.