CASE COMMENT : COMMERCIAL AGENCY - CONTRACT TERMINATION

Commercial agency: The Paris Court of Appeal retains that the mandator who unilaterally removes a part of the tasks entrusted to the commercial agent cannot be accused of breaking their contract when he refuses a new contract to compensate for this withdrawal (Frig’Invest/Boulenger)

KEYWORDS
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Board of Directors Paris, May 31, 2012, Frig'Invest v. Boulenger, RG n° 11/10619 A sales agent received two

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.